United States Population Growth Rate by Cities - U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP)
United States Statistics: Population Growth Rate by Cities (Top 20)
| No | City | State | Estimated Population Growth Rate | Growth Status | U.S. Census Bureau Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Georgetown | Texas | +14.4% | Very High | Fast Growing |
| 2 | Kyle | Texas | +10.9% | Very High | Fast Growing |
| 3 | Leander | Texas | +8.6% | High | Fast Growing |
| 4 | Murfreesboro | Tennessee | +4.7% | High | Growing |
| 5 | Fort Myers | Florida | +4.5% | High | Growing |
| 6 | Buckeye | Arizona | +4.3% | High | Growing |
| 7 | Huntsville | Alabama | +3.9% | High | Growing |
| 8 | Frisco | Texas | +3.7% | High | Growing |
| 9 | Cape Coral | Florida | +3.5% | High | Growing |
| 10 | Boise | Idaho | +2.8% | Moderate | Growing |
| 11 | Austin | Texas | +2.5% | Moderate | Growing |
| 12 | Raleigh | North Carolina | +2.4% | Moderate | Growing |
| 13 | Nashville | Tennessee | +2.1% | Moderate | Growing |
| 14 | Charlotte | North Carolina | +2.0% | Moderate | Growing |
| 15 | Orlando | Florida | +1.9% | Moderate | Growing |
| 16 | Phoenix | Arizona | +1.6% | Moderate | Growing |
| 17 | Dallas | Texas | +1.2% | Stable Growth | Stable |
| 18 | Houston | Texas | +1.1% | Stable Growth | Stable |
| 19 | San Antonio | Texas | +1.0% | Stable Growth | Stable |
| 20 | Seattle | Washington | +0.8% | Low Growth | Stable |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP). Growth rates are based on the latest available annual population estimates.
United States Statistics: Population Growth Rate by Cities (21–40)
| No | City | State | Estimated Population Growth Rate | Growth Status | U.S. Census Bureau Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Tampa | Florida | +0.8% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 22 | Jacksonville | Florida | +0.8% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 23 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | +0.7% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 24 | Fort Worth | Texas | +0.7% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 25 | Miami | Florida | +0.7% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 26 | Las Vegas | Nevada | +0.6% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 27 | Chandler | Arizona | +0.6% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 28 | Irvine | California | +0.6% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 29 | Gilbert | Arizona | +0.5% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 30 | San Diego | California | +0.5% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 31 | Atlanta | Georgia | +0.5% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 32 | Mesa | Arizona | +0.4% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 33 | Madison | Wisconsin | +0.4% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 34 | Charleston | South Carolina | +0.4% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 35 | Reno | Nevada | +0.4% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 36 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | +0.3% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 37 | Port St. Lucie | Florida | +0.3% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 38 | Lincoln | Nebraska | +0.3% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 39 | Durham | North Carolina | +0.3% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 40 | Plano | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP). Annual city population growth estimates.
United States Statistics: Population Growth Rate by Cities (41–60)
| No | City | State | Estimated Population Growth Rate | Growth Status | U.S. Census Bureau Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Arlington | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 42 | Lubbock | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 43 | Irving | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 44 | Lexington | Kentucky | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 45 | St. Petersburg | Florida | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 46 | Greensboro | North Carolina | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 47 | Garland | Texas | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 48 | Scottsdale | Arizona | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 49 | Norfolk | Virginia | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 50 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 51 | Cincinnati | Ohio | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 52 | Wichita | Kansas | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 53 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 54 | New Orleans | Louisiana | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 55 | Anchorage | Alaska | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 56 | Bakersfield | California | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 57 | Honolulu | Hawaii | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 58 | Buffalo | New York | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 59 | Toledo | Ohio | -0.2% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 60 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | -0.2% | Declining | Population Loss |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP). Annual population growth estimates for incorporated U.S. cities.
United States Statistics: Population Growth Rate by Cities (41–60)
| No | City | State | Estimated Population Growth Rate | Growth Status | U.S. Census Bureau Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Arlington | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 42 | Lubbock | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 43 | Irving | Texas | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 44 | Lexington | Kentucky | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 45 | St. Petersburg | Florida | +0.2% | Low Growth | Stable |
| 46 | Greensboro | North Carolina | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 47 | Garland | Texas | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 48 | Scottsdale | Arizona | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 49 | Norfolk | Virginia | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 50 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | +0.1% | Very Low | Stable |
| 51 | Cincinnati | Ohio | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 52 | Wichita | Kansas | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 53 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 54 | New Orleans | Louisiana | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 55 | Anchorage | Alaska | 0.0% | Stable | Stable |
| 56 | Bakersfield | California | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 57 | Honolulu | Hawaii | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 58 | Buffalo | New York | -0.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 59 | Toledo | Ohio | -0.2% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 60 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | -0.2% | Declining | Population Loss |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP). Annual population growth estimates for incorporated U.S. cities.
United States Statistics: Population Growth Rate by Cities (81–100)
| No | City | State | Estimated Population Growth Rate | Growth Status | U.S. Census Bureau Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | Scranton | Pennsylvania | -0.8% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 82 | Canton | Ohio | -0.8% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 83 | Erie | Pennsylvania | -0.9% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 84 | Peoria | Illinois | -0.9% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 85 | Rockford | Illinois | -0.9% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 86 | Evansville | Indiana | -1.0% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 87 | Decatur | Illinois | -1.0% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 88 | Macon | Georgia | -1.0% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 89 | Charleston | West Virginia | -1.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 90 | Huntington | West Virginia | -1.1% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 91 | Jackson | Mississippi | -1.2% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 92 | Pine Bluff | Arkansas | -1.3% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 93 | Wheeling | West Virginia | -1.3% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 94 | Terre Haute | Indiana | -1.4% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 95 | Danville | Illinois | -1.5% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 96 | Johnstown | Pennsylvania | -1.6% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 97 | Bluefield | West Virginia | -1.7% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 98 | Clarksburg | West Virginia | -1.8% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 99 | Beckley | West Virginia | -1.9% | Declining | Population Loss |
| 100 | Steubenville | Ohio | -2.0% | Declining | Population Loss |
Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP). Population growth rates are based on the latest annual city population estimates available from the U.S. Census Bureau.