UN Global Compact: Communication on Progress (CoP) 2026
The UN Global Compact (UNGC) Communication on Progress (CoP) 2026 represents the mandatory annual disclosure for participating companies to demonstrate their commitment to the Ten Principles. In 2026, the reporting framework emphasizes standardized, comparable data across Governance, Human Rights, Labour, Environment, and Anti-Corruption. This data-driven approach allows stakeholders to track corporate progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through a centralized digital platform, ensuring transparency and accountability in the global business community.
UN Global Compact: Communication on Progress (CoP) 2026: Core Mandatory Requirement
| # | Key Data Point | Disclosure Category | Core Mandatory Requirement |
| 1 | Digital signature | Governance | CEO Support |
| 2 | Body responsible for sustainability | Governance | Board Oversight |
| 3 | % of board with ESG competence | Governance | Board Expertise |
| 4 | Code of conduct availability | Governance | Ethics & Integrity |
| 5 | Link between ESG and compensation | Governance | Executive Pay |
| 6 | Commitment to UN Guiding Principles | Human Rights | Policy Commitment |
| 7 | Process to identify HR risks | Human Rights | Due Diligence |
| 8 | Grievance mechanism access | Human Rights | Remediation |
| 9 | % of sites reviewed for HR risks | Human Rights | Impact Assessment |
| 10 | Collective bargaining coverage % | Labour | Freedom of Association |
| 11 | % of women in management | Labour | Diversity & Inclusion |
| 12 | Unadjusted gender pay gap ratio | Labour | Pay Equity |
| 13 | Incident and injury rates | Labour | Health and Safety |
| 14 | % of staff paid a living wage | Labour | Living Wage |
| 15 | Scope 1 greenhouse gas emissions | Environment | Climate Strategy |
| 16 | Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions | Environment | Climate Strategy |
| 17 | % of renewable energy consumed | Environment | Energy Mix |
| 18 | Zero-tolerance bribery policy | Anti-Corruption | Policy Framework |
| 19 | % of employees trained in ethics | Anti-Corruption | Training |
| 20 | Incidents of corruption/legal actions | Anti-Corruption | Compliance |
| # | Key Data Point | Disclosure Category | Core Mandatory Requirement |
| 21 | Identifying severe risks in the supply chain | Human Rights | Risk Identification |
| 22 | Consulting with affected stakeholders/groups | Human Rights | Engagement |
| 23 | Policy/measures to eliminate child labour | Human Rights | Child Labour |
| 24 | Policy/measures to prevent modern slavery | Human Rights | Forced Labour |
| 25 | Actions to ensure equal opportunity at work | Human Rights | Non-discrimination |
| 26 | Process for Free, Prior, and Informed Consent | Human Rights | Indigenous Peoples |
| 27 | Compliance with local laws or ILO standards | Labour | Working Hours |
| 28 | Average training hours per employee | Labour | Skills & Training |
| 29 | Coverage for health, disability, and retirement | Labour | Social Protection |
| 30 | Monitoring supplier compliance with labour laws | Labour | Supply Chain Labour |
| 31 | Selection of key environmental focus areas | Environment | Materiality Selection |
| 32 | Disclosure of value chain emissions (if material) | Environment | GHG Emissions (Scope 3) |
| 33 | Plan for responding to physical climate risks | Environment | Climate Adaptation |
| 34 | Total volume of water used from all sources | Environment | Water Withdrawal |
| 35 | Impact of wastewater on local ecosystems | Environment | Water Discharge |
| 36 | Total weight of hazardous vs non-hazardous waste | Environment | Waste Management |
| 37 | Initiatives to reduce raw material consumption | Environment | Circularity |
| 38 | Operations in or near protected biodiversity areas | Environment | Biodiversity |
| 39 | Emissions of NOx, SOx, or other pollutants | Environment | Air Pollution |
| 40 | Total value of fines for non-compliance | Environment | Environmental Fines |
| # | Key Data Point | Disclosure Category | Core Mandatory Requirement |
| 41 | GHG reduction targets and progress | Environment | Climate Targets |
| 42 | Internal carbon pricing (if used) | Environment | Climate Governance |
| 43 | Financial impacts of climate change | Environment | Climate Risk |
| 44 | Total energy consumption in MWh | Environment | Energy Usage |
| 45 | Energy intensity per revenue/product | Environment | Energy Efficiency |
| 46 | Volume of recycled/reused water | Environment | Water Circularity |
| 47 | Waste diverted from disposal (recycling) | Environment | Waste Diversion |
| 48 | Use of sustainably sourced raw materials | Environment | Sustainable Sourcing |
| 49 | Protection of threatened species | Environment | Biodiversity Action |
| 50 | Percentage of revenue from green products | Environment | Sustainable Products |
| 51 | Anti-corruption risk assessment results | Anti-Corruption | Risk Assessment |
| 52 | Oversight of third-party intermediaries | Anti-Corruption | Third-party Diligence |
| 53 | Mechanism for reporting concerns | Anti-Corruption | Whistleblower System |
| 54 | Investigations into corruption reports | Anti-Corruption | Internal Response |
| 55 | Public policy positions and lobbying | Anti-Corruption | Political Engagement |
| 56 | Payments made to governments | Anti-Corruption | Transparency |
| 57 | Collective action initiatives joined | Anti-Corruption | Industry Collaboration |
| 58 | Board review of anti-corruption program | Anti-Corruption | Program Oversight |
| 59 | Description of a successful ESG initiative | Success Stories | Qualitative Highlight |
| 60 | Lessons learned from project failures | Success Stories | Continuous Improvement |
| # | Key Data Point | Disclosure Category | Core Mandatory Requirement |
| 61 | Identification of top priority for 2027 | Future Priorities | Strategic Direction |
| 62 | Planned investments in sustainability | Future Priorities | Resource Allocation |
| 63 | Alignment with specific UN SDGs | SDG Integration | Goal Mapping |
| 64 | Partnership activities for the Goals | SDG Integration | Collaboration |
| 65 | Third-party verification or audit | Data Assurance | External Assurance |
| 66 | Final sign-off and submission date | Governance | Verification |
| # | Data Point Identifier | Section | Data Type | Core Requirement Detail |
| 67 | Total Water Withdrawal | Environment | Number ($m^3$) | Total volume of water withdrawn from all sources |
| 68 | Water Stress Withdrawal | Environment | Number ($m^3$) | Volume of water withdrawn specifically from high stress areas |
| 69 | Water Recycle Percentage | Environment | Percentage | % of total water withdrawal that is recycled or reused |
| 70 | Total Waste Generated | Environment | Number (Tonnes) | Total weight of all waste generated during the period |
| 71 | Hazardous Waste Percentage | Environment | Percentage | % of total waste classified as hazardous by local laws |
| 72 | Total Waste Diverted | Environment | Number (Tonnes) | Total weight of waste recycled, composted, or reused |
| 73 | Circular Resource Target | Environment | Text / Select | Description of specific goals to reduce raw material usage |
| 74 | Biodiversity Site Count | Environment | Number | # of sites located in or adjacent to protected areas |
| 75 | Anti Corruption Risk Percentage | Anti-Corruption | Percentage | % of business units assessed for corruption-related risks |
| 76 | High Risk Intermediaries | Anti-Corruption | Number | # of third-party agents flagged as high risk in diligence |
| 77 | Ethics Whistleblower Count | Anti-Corruption | Number | Total reports received through the formal whistleblowing line |
| 78 | Total Corruption Incidents | Anti-Corruption | Number | # of confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery |
| 79 | Legal Action Fines | Anti-Corruption | Number ($) | Total monetary value of fines paid for corruption cases |
| 80 | Public Policy Spend | Anti-Corruption | Number ($) | Total annual expenditure on lobbying or political contributions |
| # | Key Data Point | Disclosure Category | Core Mandatory Requirement |
| 81 | Success Story Title | Success Stories | Qualitative Highlight |
| 82 | Success Story Description | Success Stories | Impact Narrative |
| 83 | Project KPI Result | Success Stories | Performance Metric |
| 84 | Failure Lesson Learned | Success Stories | Continuous Improvement |
| 85 | Future Priority 2027 | Future Strategy | Strategic Direction |
| 86 | Planned ESG Capital Expenditure | Future Strategy | Financial Commitment |
| 87 | ESG Operational Budget | Future Strategy | Resource Allocation |
| 88 | Primary SDG Goal | SDG Mapping | Goal Prioritization |
| 89 | SDG Target Alignment | SDG Mapping | Specific Target Identification |
| 90 | Partnership Type | SDG Mapping | Collaboration Framework |
| 91 | Partnership Impact | SDG Mapping | Progress Contribution |
| 92 | External Assurance Status | Data Assurance | Verification Status |
| 93 | Assurance Provider Name | Data Assurance | Auditor Identification |
| 94 | Assurance Scope Level | Data Assurance | Level of Certainty |
| 95 | Assurance Statement Document | Data Assurance | Evidence Upload |
| 96 | Reporting Boundary Definition | Governance | Organizational Scope |
| 97 | Entity Coverage Count | Governance | Subsidiary Inclusion |
| 98 | GRI Alignment Claim | Governance | Framework Interoperability |
| 99 | Final Validation Check | Verification | Accuracy Confirmation |
| 100 | Submission Timestamp | Verification | Official Filing Record |
Objectives of the Communication on Progress (CoP) 2026
The primary goal of the updated CoP is to move beyond simple narrative reporting toward a consistent, data-backed assessment of corporate sustainability. Its specific objectives include:
Standardization and Comparability: Providing a harmonized questionnaire that allows investors, NGOs, and the public to compare sustainability performance across different companies, industries, and regions.
Accountability and Transparency: Serving as a formal mechanism for companies to publicly renew their commitment and disclose their impacts—both positive and negative—on people and the planet.
Continuous Improvement: Helping companies conduct self-assessments, identify performance gaps, and set more ambitious targets based on peer benchmarking.
SDG Integration: Facilitating the direct mapping of corporate actions to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, showcasing the private sector's contribution to the 2030 Agenda.
Interoperability: Aligning with major global reporting standards (such as GRI and the EU's ESRS) to reduce the reporting burden by allowing companies to reuse data for multiple frameworks.
Interconnected Organizations and Global Partnerships in CoP 2026
The Communication on Progress (CoP) 2026 is built upon a framework of interoperability and strategic partnerships with leading global organizations. These entities provide the technical standards, data mapping, and regulatory alignment that allow the CoP to serve as a universal language for corporate sustainability.
Key Partner Organizations and Frameworks
| Organization / Initiative | Role in CoP 2026 | Impact on Reporting |
| GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) | Standard Alignment | The CoP questionnaire is mapped directly to GRI Universal Standards to reduce double-reporting. |
| EFRAG (European Financial Reporting Advisory Group) | Regulatory Interoperability | Ensures CoP data points align with the CSRD and ESRS for European compliance. |
| UN Women | Thematic Lead (Gender) | Co-developer of the Women’s Empowerment Principles (WEPs) metrics used in the Labour section. |
| ILO (International Labour Organization) | Technical Authority | Provides the underlying definitions for "Living Wage" and "Labour Rights" data points. |
| CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) | Environmental Data Mapping | Facilitates the synchronization of greenhouse gas (GHG) and water disclosure metrics. |
| IFC (International Finance Corporation) | Financial Standards | Collaborates on gender equality and private sector sustainability benchmarks. |
| UNCTAD | Intergovernmental Support | Coordinates with the SSE (Sustainable Stock Exchanges) initiative to promote CoP usage by listed companies. |
| UNODC | Anti-Corruption Governance | Partners with the UNGC to define the business integrity and anti-bribery metrics. |
Global Governance and Local Networks
The implementation of the 100 data points is supported by a robust organizational hierarchy that ensures local relevance:
UN Global Compact Headquarters (New York): Sets the global "2026–2030 Strategy" and maintains the digital reporting platform.
66 Country Networks: Organizations such as Global Compact Network Netherlands, Croatia, or Kenya provide localized training and guidance to help domestic companies navigate the questionnaire.
The Academy: The UNGC’s digital learning platform that provides the specific "Questionnaire Guidebook" and technical training for sustainability professionals.
Specialized Coalitions: Initiatives like the CEO Water Mandate (in partnership with the Pacific Institute) and the CFO Coalition for the SDGs provide the specialized metrics for the most advanced data points.
Reporting Period and Publication Window for CoP 2026
The UN Global Compact (UNGC) 2026 reporting cycle follows a strict universal timeline for all business participants. Understanding the distinction between the Reporting Period (the data window) and the Publication Window (the submission dates) is critical to maintaining an "Active" status and avoiding delisting.
1. The Publication Window (Submission Dates)
The publication window is the fixed period during which the digital platform is open for companies to submit their CEO Statement and CoP Questionnaire.
Opening Date: April 1, 2026
Closing Date: July 31, 2026
The "Non-Communicating" Deadline: If a report is not submitted by July 31, the company is automatically designated as "Non-communicating" on August 1, 2026.
The Delisting Deadline: Failure to submit a late report by December 31, 2026, results in the company being "Delisted" (expelled) from the UN Global Compact on January 1, 2027.
2. The Reporting Period (Data Window)
While the report is published in mid-2026, the data itself must cover a recent 12-month period. The UNGC allows flexibility to align with your company's specific fiscal year, provided you are consistent year-over-year.
| Common Reporting Cycles | Start Date | End Date |
| Calendar Year (Standard) | January 1, 2025 | December 31, 2025 |
| Fiscal Year (Mid-Year) | July 1, 2024 | June 30, 2025 |
| Recent 12-Month (Rolling) | April 1, 2025 | March 31, 2026 |
Key Rule: The data used must cover a 12-month period that closed within the 12 months prior to your submission. For the 2026 CoP, most companies will report on their full 2025 calendar year performance.
3. Exceptions for New Joiners
The reporting requirement depends on when your organization joined the initiative:
Joined before Jan 1, 2026: You must submit a CoP during the April–July 2026 window.
Joined on or after Jan 1, 2026: You are exempt for the current year. Your first mandatory CoP submission will be due during the 2027 reporting cycle.
Submission Process for CoP 2026
The submission process for the 2026 Communication on Progress (CoP) is conducted exclusively through the UN Global Compact’s centralized digital platform. This process is designed to be streamlined, ensuring that the 100+ data points are captured accurately and made publicly available for stakeholder review.
Step-by-Step Submission Flow
The submission follows a specific sequence that must be completed within the April 1 – July 31 window.
Platform Access: Log in to the digital dashboard using your organization’s credentials. Navigate to the "Communication on Progress" tab to launch the 2026 digital questionnaire.
CEO Statement of Continued Support: This is the first mandatory component. The platform provides a standardized digital template where the CEO (or highest-level executive) confirms the company's ongoing commitment to the Ten Principles. This is signed electronically directly within the portal.
Completing the Questionnaire: Enter the quantitative and qualitative data for the data points across the five sections: Governance, Human Rights, Labour, Environment, and Anti-Corruption.
Note: You can save progress and return later, allowing different departments to contribute their specific metrics.
Sustainability Report Upload: While the digital questionnaire is the primary requirement for data comparability, companies are encouraged to upload their full Annual Sustainability Report (PDF) as supplementary evidence.
Review and Validation: Before final submission, the platform provides a summary of all responses. This is the final opportunity to correct data errors. Once "Submit" is clicked, the report is locked for the current cycle.
Public Disclosure: Upon submission, the CoP is automatically published on the organization’s public profile on the official website, where it becomes available for public download and review.
Submission Requirements Checklist
| Requirement | Format | Mandatory? |
| Electronic Signature | Digital click-to-sign in portal | Yes |
| Digital Questionnaire | Data entry into 5 themed modules | Yes |
| Supporting Documents | PDF (Max 50MB per file) | Optional |
| Language | English (Preferred) + Local Language | Mandatory |
Critical "Non-Communicating" Risk
If the "Submit" button is not pressed by July 31, 2026, the system automatically triggers a status change. The organization's profile will display a "Non-communicating" badge, visible to investors and the public. This status remains until the submission is successfully completed.
Data Access and Visibility in CoP 2026
A fundamental pillar of the UN Global Compact (UNGC) is transparency. Consequently, almost all information submitted during the 2026 Communication on Progress (CoP) cycle is designed for public consumption. This "Open Data" approach allows investors, researchers, and consumers to hold companies accountable for their sustainability claims.
Data Accessibility Matrix
The following table breaks down who can see your data and how they can interact with it once the report is submitted.
| Access Level | Stakeholder Group | Visibility Scope | Features Available |
| Public Access | General Public, NGOs, Media | Full Disclosure | View and download individual company CoPs as PDFs directly from the UNGC website. |
| Investor Access | Financial Institutions, ESG Analysts | Full Disclosure + Raw Data | Access to the CoP Data Visualization Tools to filter and export raw sustainability metrics. |
| Internal Access | Your Company Users | Private Dashboard | Real-time entry, progress tracking, and historical data comparison from previous years. |
| Benchmarking Access | Participating Businesses | Aggregated Data | Compare your company's performance against industry peers, regions, or company sizes. |
| Research Access | Academic & UN Entities | Aggregated & Trend Data | Use of anonymized data to identify global sustainability trends and gaps in SDG progress. |
Key Data Access Principles
Public by Default: All data entered into the questionnaire, including any uploaded supplementary PDF reports, is made publicly available on your company’s participant profile. There is no "private" or "confidential" mode for mandatory questions.
Data Visualization Tools: The UNGC provides interactive dashboards (powered by Tableau) that allow stakeholders to analyze aggregated data. For example, a stakeholder could visualize the average "Gender Pay Ratio" for all manufacturing companies in Europe.
Commercial Use Restrictions: While the data is open and can be used freely for research and accountability, it may not be used for commercial purposes (e.g., selling a database of the results) without prior permission from the UN Global Compact.
Responsibility for Accuracy: The UNGC does not verify the accuracy of the data submitted. The "Data Access" policy explicitly states that the reporting company is solely responsible for the truthfulness of the information made available to the public.
Protecting Sensitive Information
Because of this high level of transparency, organizations should ensure that no proprietary trade secrets or sensitive personal employee data (beyond the required aggregated percentages) are included in the narrative sections.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The following FAQ addresses the most common technical and strategic concerns regarding the UN Global Compact 2026 reporting cycle.
| Question | Answer |
| Who is required to submit the 2026 CoP? | All business participants that joined the UN Global Compact before January 1, 2026. If you joined on or after this date, your first mandatory report is due in 2027. |
| Is the digital questionnaire mandatory? | Yes. In 2026, the digital questionnaire is the primary requirement. While you can upload a PDF sustainability report as a supplement, it does not replace the need to complete the mandatory data fields in the portal. |
| What happens if we miss the July 31st deadline? | Your company will be listed as "Non-communicating" on the global participant map. You have until December 31, 2026, to submit a late report and return to "Active" status. |
| Can subsidiaries report separately? | By default, subsidiaries are covered under the Parent Company's consolidated report. However, if a subsidiary wants to showcase its own local ESG leadership, it can choose to submit an independent CoP. |
| Is third-party data assurance required? | No. While the UNGC encourages external assurance (Data Point 92), it is not a requirement for submission. You simply need to disclose whether the data has been verified or not. |
| In what language should we submit? | The UNGC platform supports multiple languages. However, to ensure maximum visibility for global investors, submitting in English (or providing an English translation of your narrative sections) is highly recommended. |
| Can we edit the CoP after it is submitted? | According to the Amendment Policy, you can request an edit for material errors. However, because the data is published instantly, it is best to use the "Save as Draft" feature and perform a final internal audit before hitting submit. |
| Are there different "Levels" of reporting (e.g., Learner vs. Advanced)? | No. As of the 2024–2026 strategy, the UNGC has moved to a single, universal questionnaire for all companies to ensure data comparability across the entire network. |
Comparison: Active vs. Non-Communicating Status
| Status | Meaning | Consequence |
| Active | CoP submitted within the April 1 – July 31 window. | Full access to UNGC branding, tools, and local network events. |
| Non-communicating | Failed to submit by July 31. | A red warning badge appears on your public profile; loss of "Active" status benefits. |
| Delisted | Failed to submit by December 31. | Expulsion from the UN Global Compact; company name is published on the "Delisted" list. |
Glossary of Terms: UN Global Compact CoP 2026
This glossary provides the standardized definitions used within the 2026 Communication on Progress (CoP) questionnaire. Consistency in these terms is vital for accurate data aggregation and peer benchmarking.
| Term | Definition in the CoP 2026 Context |
| Affected Stakeholders | Individuals or groups who may be positively or negatively impacted by a company’s actions. This includes employees, contract workers, and local communities. |
| Business Relationships | Relationships directly linked to a company's operations, products, or services. This encompasses joint ventures, vendors, franchisees, and licensees. |
| Child Labour | Work that deprives children of their childhood, potential, and dignity. It refers to work that is mentally or physically dangerous and harmful to development. |
| Collective Bargaining | Negotiations between one or more employers and workers' organizations to determine working conditions and terms of employment. |
| $CO_2$ Equivalent ($CO_2e$) | The universal unit of measurement used to indicate the global warming potential of various greenhouse gases (GHGs) relative to carbon dioxide. |
| Core Contractors | Individuals or entities otherwise engaged in the company’s core business (e.g., manufacturing production lines) but not directly on the payroll. |
| Decent Work | Work that involves opportunities for productive work with a fair income, workplace security, social protection, and freedom for personal development. |
| Ecosystem Restoration | The process of reversing the degradation of ecosystems (landscapes, lakes, oceans) to regain ecological functionality and productivity. |
| Energy Consumption | The total energy used, calculated as: (Non-renewable fuel + Renewable fuel) + (Purchased electricity, heating, cooling, and steam). |
| Grievance Mechanism | A formal, non-judicial process through which stakeholders can raise concerns about the company's impact and seek remedy. |
| Living Wage | A remuneration level that is sufficient to afford a decent standard of living for the worker and their family in a specific location. |
| Materiality | The process of identifying the specific ESG topics that are most significant to the company's impact on the economy, environment, and people. |
| Operational Functions | Roles within the organization that are not classified as management (Junior, Middle, Upper, or Executive) but focus on core daily tasks. |
| Parent Company | The highest-level legal entity in a corporate group that holds responsibility for the consolidated reporting of all interconnected subsidiaries. |
| Remediation | The act of providing a remedy for a negative impact that a company has caused or contributed to (e.g., apologies, financial compensation, or reform). |
| Value Chain | The full range of activities needed to create a product or service, from conception through delivery to final disposal (Scope 1, 2, and 3). |
Understanding Management Levels
For Data Points 18 and 19 (Diversity and Pay), the UNGC uses a standardized hierarchy to ensure data is comparable across different global corporate structures:
Executive Management: The CEO and those reporting directly to the CEO/Board.
Upper Management: Senior leaders reporting to Executive Management.
Middle Management: Managers reporting to Upper Management.
Junior/Entry Level: Supervisors and team leads reporting to Middle Management.

%202026%20-%20Key%20Point%20Mandatory%20Requirement.jpg)