%20-%20Best%20Practice%20in%20Leading%20Countries.jpg "IMF GFSR: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) - Best Practice in Leading Countries")
IMF GFSR: Navigating the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
The Global Financial Stability Report (GFSR), published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), serves as a critical barometer for the health of the world's financial systems. In the 2025 and 2026 reports, a significant focus has been placed on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) as a primary defense against systemic shocks.
1. Understanding the LCR Framework
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio is a cornerstone of the Basel III regulatory reforms. Its primary objective is to ensure that financial institutions have enough high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to survive a severe 30-day stress scenario.
The LCR Formula:
LCR = (Stock of High-Quality Liquid Assets) / (Total Net Cash Outflows over 30 days) ≥ 100%
2. Core Components of Liquidity Risk
The following table summarizes how the IMF categorizes the elements that dictate a bank's LCR health:
| Component | Description | IMF Focus Area (2025-2026) |
| HQLA (Level 1) | Cash, central bank reserves, and 0% risk-weighted sovereign bonds. | Ensuring these remain "tradable" during high-volatility market events. |
| HQLA (Level 2) | Corporate bonds (AA- to BBB-) and certain mortgage-backed securities. | Monitoring "haircuts" (value reductions) during sudden credit spreads. |
| Retail Outflows | Expected withdrawals from personal bank accounts. | Increasing the "run rate" assumptions due to mobile banking speed. |
| Wholesale Outflows | Funding pulled by other financial institutions or corporations. | High risk of "contagion" between banks and non-bank entities (NBFIs). |
3. Key Insights from Recent GFSRs
Recent IMF assessments highlight that while the LCR has strengthened the banking sector, new "blind spots" are emerging due to shifting market dynamics.
The "Complacency" Warning
The October 2025 GFSR noted that while LCR levels at major banks remain above the 100% threshold, the usability of these buffers is a concern. Banks are often hesitant to use their HQLA during stress for fear of signaling weakness to the market.
The Digital Bank Run Factor
By early 2026, the IMF highlighted that digital banking and social media have shortened the timeframe of a "bank run" from weeks to hours. This suggests that the standard 30-day LCR window may need to be supplemented by a "24-hour survival" metric.
4. Future Outlook
The IMF continues to advocate for a "multipronged" approach. While the LCR is effective for short-term shocks, it must be paired with the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) to ensure banks aren't over-relying on volatile wholesale funding for long-term assets.
Key Takeaway: The LCR is no longer just a regulatory checkbox; it is a dynamic indicator that the IMF believes must evolve to account for instant digital transactions and geopolitical fragmentation.
Top Performing Countries by Liquidity Standards (2025-2026)
Based on the 2025 and 2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR), global performance in terms of liquidity and financial resilience has been defined by a "great divergence." While advanced economies maintain deep pools of assets, several emerging markets have emerged as "liquidity anchors" due to conservative banking reforms and high commodity-driven inflows.
Global Liquidity Performance Overview
As of early 2026, the IMF highlights that countries with the best performance are those that have successfully balanced high HQLA buffers with low currency mismatch risks.
Top Performing Jurisdictions: Liquidity and Stability Metrics
The following table highlights the top-performing countries based on their banking sector's average LCR and overall stability outlook as reported in the most recent IMF assessments.
| Flag | Country | Avg. LCR (2025-26) | Primary Strength | IMF Performance Note |
| 🇮🇩 | Indonesia | ~240% | Resilient Domestic Inflows | Labeled a "global bright spot" due to strong macro buffers and high capital ratios. |
| 🇸🇦 | Saudi Arabia | ~190% | Sovereign Backed Liquidity | Benefited from deep local investor bases and robust hydrocarbon-driven reserves. |
| 🇨🇦 | Canada | ~145% | High-Quality Asset Mix | Maintained stability despite global property market cooling and rate volatility. |
| 🇦🇺 | Australia | ~135% | Prudent Lending Standards | Large liquid asset buffers helped navigate the 2025 regional trade fluctuations. |
| 🇺🇸 | United States | ~125% | Market Depth & Access | Remains the "primary safe haven," though monitored for non-bank financial risks. |
Key Performance Drivers in 2026
Local Investor Depth: Countries like Indonesia and Saudi Arabia have seen their performance boosted by developing deep local bond markets, reducing their reliance on volatile "hot money" from abroad.
The "Tariff Shield": Banks in countries that maintained diverse trade partnerships showed better liquidity stability during the April 2025 geopolitical shifts compared to those with highly concentrated trade dependencies.
Digital Run Resilience: High-performing countries have updated their stress-test models to account for "instant withdrawals," ensuring their LCR remains valid even in the age of viral social media bank runs.
Note on Advanced Economies: While the Euro Area maintains an average LCR above 140%, the IMF has flagged "systemic liquidity" concerns for 2026 as central banks continue to shrink their balance sheets, which reduces the total amount of excess cash in the system.
Indonesia’s Banking Resilience: Navigating the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
In the 2025 and 2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR), Indonesia has been consistently highlighted as a "liquidity anchor" in Southeast Asia. This stability is driven by proactive regulation from the Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) and a banking sector that maintains buffers far exceeding international minimums.
1. The LCR Landscape in Indonesia (2025-2026)
As of early 2026, the Indonesian banking industry maintains one of the highest Liquidity Coverage Ratios globally. While the Basel III global standard requires a minimum of 100%, Indonesian banks have historically doubled or even tripled this requirement to buffer against external shocks like currency volatility or commodity price shifts.
Current Performance Snapshot (December 2025):
Average Industry LCR: 200.97%
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR): 25.89%
Net Non-Performing Loans (NPL): 0.79%
2. New 2025-2026 Regulations (POJK 20/2025)
A major development in 2025 was the issuance of OJK Regulation (POJK) No. 20 of 2025, which specifically targeted Islamic Commercial Banks (BUS) and Islamic Business Units (UUS).
Before this, Islamic banks operated under slightly different liquidity frameworks. The new rule aligns them with the same rigorous Basel III standards as conventional banks.
The Phased Implementation Schedule:
The OJK has introduced a "glide path" for these banks to reach full compliance without straining their lending capabilities:
| Compliance Deadline | Minimum LCR Requirement |
| June 30, 2026 | 80% |
| June 30, 2027 | 90% |
| June 30, 2028 | 100% |
3. Why Indonesia Outperforms Global Peers
According to the October 2025 GFSR, Indonesia’s high performance is attributed to three primary "stability pillars":
Deep Local Investor Base: Indonesia has successfully shifted its debt absorption toward domestic investors. This reduces "funding liquidity risk" because local banks hold high-quality government bonds (SBN) in Rupiah, which are highly liquid and not subject to foreign capital flight.
The SRBI Effect: Bank Indonesia’s issuance of Sekuritas Rupiah Bank Indonesia (SRBI) has provided banks with a high-yield, high-quality liquid asset (HQLA) that bolsters their LCR while supporting the Rupiah's stability.
Conservative Lending: Indonesian banks traditionally maintain a "high-buffer" culture, often keeping their Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR) in a healthy range (around 84-86%) even during periods of high credit demand.
4. Risks Monitored by the IMF for 2026
Despite the strong numbers, the IMF warns of two specific "liquidity drains" for the Indonesian market in the coming year:
Digital Outflow Speed: With over 12 million users now on high-speed banking apps (like wondr by BNI), the OJK is monitoring whether "retail deposits" are truly as stable as the LCR formula assumes.
The "Sovereign-Bank Nexus": Because Indonesian banks hold so much government debt (to stay liquid), a shock to the government’s fiscal health could theoretically impact the banks' liquidity buffers—a cycle the IMF calls the "nexus risk."
Saudi Arabia’s Banking Stability: The Role of Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
In the 2025 and 2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR), Saudi Arabia’s banking sector is noted for its "robust resilience" amidst global trade uncertainty. Under the supervision of the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA), the Kingdom has maintained some of the strongest liquidity buffers in the Middle East, primarily to support the massive capital needs of Vision 2030 projects.
1. The LCR Framework in Saudi Arabia (2025-2026)
As of early 2026, Saudi banks maintain a Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) well above the global regulatory minimum of 100%. This ensure banks have enough High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) to survive a 30-day stress scenario.
Current Performance Snapshot (Early 2026):
Average Industry LCR: ~160% (Varies by institution, e.g., BSF at 160.4% in late 2025).
Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR): ~20%
Regulatory Loan-to-Deposit Ratio (LDR): ~80% (Remains well below SAMA's 90% limit).
2. Key Drivers of Saudi Liquidity Strength
According to the October 2025 GFSR, Saudi Arabia's liquidity outperformance is built on three strategic pillars:
Sovereign-Led Deposits: A significant portion of the banking system's liquidity is anchored by government-related entities (GREs). In 2025, these deposits grew by nearly 9%, providing a stable base for corporate lending.
The "Giga-Project" Backstop: While funding for projects like NEOM and the Red Sea requires massive capital, SAMA has proactively managed the "funding concentration" risk, ensuring banks don't over-leverage their short-term liquidity for long-term construction cycles.
Conservative Macroprudential Policy: SAMA recently introduced a 100 basis points countercyclical capital buffer (effective 2025), which acts as a secondary layer of protection alongside the LCR to absorb shocks during volatile oil price periods.
3. Emerging Trends and IMF Observations
The 2026 IMF assessments highlight specific shifts in how Saudi Arabia manages its liquidity:
| Focus Area | Status / Observation (2025-2026) |
| Islamic Banking LCR | SAMA has implemented specific guidance to manage liquidity for Islamic banks separately to ensure Shariah-compliant HQLA are accurately valued. |
| Funding Concentration | The IMF warned in late 2025 that while LCR is high, "funding concentration" (reliance on large GRE deposits) remains a metric to monitor. |
| Digital Transformation | With Saudi Arabia’s high digital adoption, SAMA is updating "outflow rate" assumptions, as retail users can move funds instantly via mobile apps. |
4. Risks and the 2026 Outlook
Despite the high LCR, the IMF has flagged the Sovereign-Bank Nexus as a potential watchpoint for 2026. Because Saudi banks are heavily involved in financing state-led initiatives, their liquidity is intrinsically linked to the government's fiscal health and oil market performance.
Key Takeaway: For 2026, the IMF views Saudi Arabia as a "model of stability" in the region, provided SAMA continues its vigilant monitoring of the construction-led credit boom and maintains the current high-quality asset requirements.
Canada’s Financial Resilience: Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and the 2026 Reforms
According to the IMF’s 2025 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) and the 2026 Bank of Canada updates, Canada’s banking system remains a global leader in liquidity management. As of early 2026, the Canadian financial landscape is undergoing a significant transition due to updated guidelines from the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI).
1. The LCR Standard in Canada
Canada adheres strictly to the Basel III framework, requiring all "Big Six" domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) to maintain an LCR of at least 100%. This ensures they have a sufficient "Stock of High-Quality Liquid Assets" (HQLA) to cover total net cash outflows over a 30-day stress period.
Current Performance Snapshot (Early 2026):
Average D-SIB LCR: ~145%
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Ratio: ~12.5%
Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR): Consistently above 115%
2. Major 2026 Regulatory Update: The LAR Guideline
A defining shift for the Canadian market is the implementation of the 2026 Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR) Guideline, effective May 1, 2026.
Key Changes in the 2026 Guideline:
Refined Deposit Treatment: Clearer classification of "retail funding" to better predict how fast money leaves during a crisis.
Partnership Deposits: New rules for deposits brought in through third-party apps or fintech partners, assigning higher "run-off" rates to these potentially volatile funds.
Crypto-Asset Integration: Following the 2025 "Crypto-Asset Exposures Guideline," banks must now account for tokenized traditional assets within their HQLA calculations.
3. IMF Observations on Systemic Liquidity (2025-2026)
In its July 2025 Technical Note on Systemic Liquidity, the IMF noted that while individual Canadian banks have high LCRs, the broader system faces specific challenges:
| Risk Factor | IMF Assessment | Observation for 2026 |
| Funding Concentration | High | A small number of domestic providers dominate the short-term funding market. |
| Non-Bank Linkages | Growing | Hedge funds and asset managers are increasingly active in the Government of Canada (GoC) bond market, creating potential "crowding out" risks. |
| Trade Shocks | Moderate | The "2025 Tariff Shock" tested liquidity, but USMCA exemptions and Bank of Canada easing provided a necessary cushion. |
4. The "Intraday" and "Digital" Challenge
The Bank of Canada’s 2025 Financial Stability Report emphasized that the 30-day LCR window is no longer sufficient on its own. Because of Canada's advanced digital payment infrastructure (e.g., Interac e-Transfer), retail bank runs can occur in minutes rather than days.
In response, OSFI’s 2026 framework places increased weight on Chapter 7: Intraday Liquidity Monitoring, forcing banks to prove they can meet payment and settlement obligations in real-time, not just over a monthly average.
Key Takeaway for 2026: Canada is shifting from a "static" LCR compliance model to a "dynamic" liquidity monitoring system that accounts for digital speed and the growing influence of non-bank financial intermediaries.
Australia’s Financial Fortress: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) in 2026
In the 2025 and 2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR), Australia’s banking system is lauded for its "soft landing" and robust capital settings. Under the oversight of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Australian banks maintain liquidity buffers that are among the most resilient in the developed world, specifically designed to withstand the country's unique exposure to global trade shifts and high household debt.
1. The LCR Standard in Australia
Australia was an early adopter of the Basel III LCR, requiring "internationally active" banks to hold enough High-Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) to survive a 30-day period of extreme stress.
The Current Performance Snapshot (As of February 2026):
Industry-Wide Average LCR: 130.1% (Well above the 100% minimum).
Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR): 115.9%
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital Ratio: 12.4%
2. Major 2025-2026 Regulatory Reforms
As of July 1, 2025, APRA implemented key updates to Prudential Standard APS 210 (Liquidity) to ensure banks are prepared for modern, fast-moving crises.
Market-to-Market Valuation: Banks under the "Minimum Liquid Holdings" (MLH) regime must now adjust the value of their liquid assets regularly to reflect current market prices, preventing "hidden" liquidity shortfalls during bond market volatility.
ELA Readiness: All banks must now be "operationally ready" to provide real-time data when requesting Exceptional Liquidity Assistance (ELA) from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA).
Macquarie Bank "Add-on" Relief: In a notable move in February 2026, APRA reduced the specific liquidity "add-on" requirements for Macquarie Bank (from 25% down to 15%) following successful remediation of their risk controls.
3. IMF Observations on the Australian Landscape
The February 2026 IMF Article IV Consultation highlighted several factors that define Australia's current liquidity performance:
| Factor | IMF Assessment (2025-2026) |
| Asset Quality | Improving. Lower credit impairment charges in late 2025 have bolstered bank balance sheets. |
| Household Resilience | Strong. Despite high debt, a robust labor market (4.3% unemployment) has kept mortgage defaults low. |
| China Exposure | Monitored. The IMF warns that stress in China’s property sector remains a "spillover risk" for Australian liquidity via trade channels. |
| Digital Risk | High. APRA is closely watching the "speed of digital runs" as Australian consumers are among the world's fastest adopters of instant banking. |
4. Performance of the "Big Four" Banks (2026)
Recent quarterly updates from Australia’s major banks show a consistent "buffer-first" strategy:
Commonwealth Bank (CBA): Reported an LCR of 132% in early 2026, supported by a massive 79% deposit funding ratio.
National Australia Bank (NAB): Maintained an LCR of 135%, citing a supportive domestic economic environment and disciplined strategy.
Westpac & ANZ: Both continue to hold LCRs in the 130-135% range, focusing on diversifying their wholesale funding sources.
5. Future Outlook: The 2027 Shift
The IMF and APRA have already signaled the next big shift: The phase-out of "Additional Tier 1" (AT1) capital starting January 1, 2027.
To make the system even safer, Australian banks will replace complex AT1 instruments with more reliable Common Equity (CET1) and Tier 2 capital. This move is intended to ensure that when a stress event happens, the "liquidity" and "capital" of the bank are even easier to access and understand.
Key Takeaway: Australia enters mid-2026 with high liquidity "fortress" settings. While the LCR is strong, the focus is shifting toward operational resilience—ensuring that banks can actually move their liquid assets fast enough to counter a digital bank run.
United States Financial Stability: The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) in 2026
In the 2025 and 2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR), the United States banking system is described as the "global epicenter of liquidity," yet one that faces unique structural challenges. Under the joint supervision of the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the OCC, the U.S. has maintained rigorous LCR standards to ensure that its largest institutions can withstand a sudden "flight to quality" or a digital-age bank run.
1. The U.S. LCR Framework
The U.S. version of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio is generally more stringent than the minimum international Basel III standards. It applies primarily to large, internationally active banking organizations (Category I and II) and certain large regional banks (Category III).
The Core Metric:
LCR = (High-Quality Liquid Assets) / (Total Net Cash Outflows over 30 days) ≥ 100%
Category I (G-SIBs): U.S. Global Systemically Important Banks (like JPMorgan Chase, BofA, and Citi) must maintain a full 100% LCR calculated daily.
Category III (Regional Leaders): Large regional banks (e.g., US Bancorp, PNC) are subject to a "reduced" LCR (typically 85%) to reflect their smaller systemic footprint, though this has been under intense debate following the 2023 regional banking stress.
2. 2026 Performance and Trends
As of February 2026, the U.S. banking sector continues to hold massive liquidity buffers, though the total volume of excess reserves has slightly decreased due to the Federal Reserve's long-term balance sheet normalization.
| Metric | Estimated 2026 Average | IMF/Market Observation |
| G-SIB LCR Average | ~122% | Banks are holding more HQLA than required to signal strength to markets. |
| HQLA Composition | 70% Level 1 | U.S. banks heavily favor Treasuries and Fed reserves over corporate bonds. |
| Retail Deposit Stability | Moderate | Outflow assumptions for "uninsured deposits" have been tightened in 2026. |
3. Key 2026 Regulatory Updates: "Basel III Endgame"
The most significant development in 2026 is the finalization of the "Basel III Endgame" rules in the United States.
Standardized Outflow Rates: In early 2026, the Federal Reserve updated the "outflow rates" for certain wholesale funding sources, specifically targeting the interconnectedness between banks and Non-Bank Financial Intermediaries (NBFIs) like hedge funds and private credit.
Operational Resilience: Following the IMF's advice, U.S. regulators now require banks to prove "operational readiness" to monetize their HQLA. It is no longer enough to have Treasuries; banks must prove they can convert them to cash via the Standing Repo Facility (SRF) instantly during a crisis.
4. IMF Risks for the U.S. Market (2026)
The January 2026 IMF World Economic Outlook and the October 2025 GFSR highlight three specific "liquidity drains" for the U.S.:
The Digital Run Factor: The IMF warns that U.S. retail deposits are "hyper-mobile." The speed of Venmo, Zelle, and mobile banking means that a 30-day LCR window might be too slow to capture a 24-hour liquidity event.
Sovereign Bond Volatility: Because Treasuries are the primary HQLA for U.S. banks, sudden "yield spikes" or fiscal uncertainty in Washington can paradoxically lower the market value of a bank’s liquidity buffer just when they need it most.
Private Credit Nexus: The U.S. has the world's largest private credit market. The IMF is concerned that banks have "hidden" liquidity commitments to these funds that aren't fully captured in standard LCR reporting.
5. Summary Table: U.S. LCR Categories (2026)
| Bank Category | Asset Size | LCR Requirement | Calculation Frequency |
| Category I (G-SIBs) | >$250B + High Complexity | 100% | Daily |
| Category II | >$700B or >$75B Cross-Jurisdictional | 100% | Daily |
| Category III | $250B - $700B | 85% | Daily |
| Category IV | $100B - $250B | None (Internal Monitoring) | Monthly |
Key Takeaway: For 2026, the U.S. remains the gold standard for liquidity depth. However, the IMF suggests that the "simplicity" of the LCR may be masking risks associated with the speed of digital transfers and the growth of the shadow banking sector.
Best Practices in Global Liquidity Management: Leading Countries and IMF Standards
The 2025-2026 IMF Global Financial Stability Reports (GFSR) highlight a shift from "compliance-based" liquidity to "operational" resilience. As digital banking accelerates and geopolitical fragmentation increases, leading economies have moved beyond the basic 100% Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) toward more dynamic best practices.
1. Global Best Practices in Leading Jurisdictions
Leading economies are now implementing what the IMF calls "LCR+" strategies—frameworks that treat the 100% ratio as a floor, not a target, and integrate real-time monitoring.
| Country | Best Practice Leadership | Core Innovation (2025-2026) |
| 🇨🇦 Canada | Intraday Monitoring | New LAR Guideline (2026) requires banks to prove liquidity adequacy on an intraday basis to counter instant digital runs. |
| 🇦🇺 Australia | Market-to-Market HQLA | Moving away from static accounting; APRA now requires banks to value their liquid assets at current market prices to avoid "valuation surprises." |
| 🇺🇸 United States | Operational Readiness | Under the "Basel III Endgame," G-SIBs must prove they can actually monetize Treasuries via the Fed’s Standing Repo Facility (SRF) within hours. |
| 🇮🇩 Indonesia | Macro-Buffer Integration | Integrating LCR with the Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) to create a "double shield," maintaining buffers nearly 2x the global minimum. |
| 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | Sovereign-Led Anchoring | Utilizing Government-Related Entity (GRE) deposits as a stabilizing "liquidity backstop" for large-scale national infrastructure projects. |
2. The IMF's "Three Pillars" of Best Practice (2026)
The IMF recommends that all member nations adopt the following three pillars to evolve their LCR frameworks for the modern era:
Pillar 1: Usability of Buffers
The IMF has observed a "fear of stigma" where banks refuse to use their HQLA during stress for fear of looking weak.
Best Practice: Regulators must provide "clear guidance" that dipping below 100% during stress is acceptable and expected, provided a recovery plan is in place.
Pillar 2: Addressing the "Digital Run"
Standard LCR assumes a 30-day stress window. However, in 2026, a bank run can happen in 30 minutes via social media.
Best Practice: Countries should supplement the LCR with "Net Cumulative Cash Flow (NCCF)" metrics that monitor survival periods over much shorter horizons (e.g., 24-hour or 5-day windows).
Pillar 3: The NBFI Nexus
The 2025 GFSR, "Shifting Ground beneath the Calm," warned of hidden liquidity drains from Non-Bank Financial Intermediaries (hedge funds, private credit).
Best Practice: Banks must include "contingent liquidity lines" to NBFIs in their outflow calculations, assuming these lines will be fully drawn during a market shock.
3. Implementation Checklist for 2026
For a country to be considered "best-in-class" by IMF standards in 2026, its banking system must demonstrate:
Daily LCR Reporting: Moving from monthly to daily (or real-time) data submission to the Central Bank.
Currency Matching: Maintaining specific LCRs for each significant foreign currency (e.g., USD, EUR) to prevent "mismatch crises."
Stress Test Evolution: Including "social-media-driven outflow" scenarios in annual stress tests.
Conclusion: Toward Dynamic Stability
The evolution of the Liquidity Coverage Ratio in 2026 represents a fundamental change in how the global financial system views safety. Best practices are no longer defined solely by the volume of cash on hand, but by the speed of response and the transparency of interconnectedness.
Countries like Canada and Australia are leading the way by making liquidity "dynamic" through intraday monitoring and market-to-market valuations. Meanwhile, emerging leaders like Indonesia and Saudi Arabia demonstrate that maintaining high, sovereign-backed buffers remains the most effective defense against global geoeconomic shifts. As the IMF concludes in its 2026 assessment, the ultimate goal of the LCR is not just to survive a 30-day storm, but to provide the confidence that prevents the storm from forming in the first place.